CRAN is maintained by the efforts of volunteers (the “CRAN team”) and the resources of the R Foundation and the employers of those volunteers (WU Wien, TU Dortmund, U Oxford, U Auckland). Having a package distributed by CRAN is subject to a set of policies, and submitting a package (including an update) to CRAN indicates agreement to these policies.
CRAN hosts packages of publication quality and is not a development platform. A package’s contribution has to be non-trivial.
Distributing code or documentation is subject to legal requirements, and CRAN operates in many jurisdictions. One of the aims of these policies is to ensure that the distributors meet their legal obligations of diligence without excessive work.
The time of the volunteers is CRAN’s most precious resource, and they reserve the right to remove or modify packages on CRAN without notice or explanation (although notification will usually be given).
All correspondence with CRAN must be sent to
CRAN-submissions@R-project.org (for submissions) or
CRAN@R-project.org (for published packages)
and not to members of the team, in plain text ASCII and not HTML.
Preferably, an ‘Authors@R’ field would be used with ‘ctb’ roles for the authors of such code. Alternatively, the ‘Author’ field should list these authors as contributors.
Where copyrights are held by an entity other than the package authors, this should preferably be indicated via ‘cph’ roles in the ‘Authors@R’ field, or using a ‘Copyright’ field (if necessary referring to an inst/COPYRIGHTS file).
Trademarks must be respected.
(’All components’ includes any downloaded at installation or during use.)
The maintainer warrants that (s)he is acting on behalf of all credited authors and has their agreement to use their material in the way it is included in the package (or if this is not possible, warrants that it is used in accordance with the license granted by the original author).
Additional DESCRIPTION fields could be used for providing email addresses for contacting the package authors/developers (e.g., ‘Contact’), or a URL for submitting bug reports (e.g., ‘BugReports’).
Citations in the ‘Description’ field of the DESCRIPTION file should be in author-year style, followed by a DOI or ISBN for published materials, or a URL otherwise. Preferably, the year and identifier would be enclosed, respectively, in parentheses and angle brackets.
autoconf). For Java .class and .jar files, the sources should be in a top-level java directory in the source package (or that directory should explain how they can be obtained).
Such packages are not permitted to require (e.g., by specifying in ‘Depends’, ‘Imports’ or ‘LinkingTo’ fields) directly or indirectly a package or external software which restricts users or usage.
The package’s license must give the right for CRAN to distribute the package in perpetuity. Any change to a package’s license must be highlighted when an update is submitted (for there have been instances of an undocumented license change removing even the right of CRAN to distribute the package).
Packages with licenses not listed at https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/share/licenses/license.db will generally not be accepted.
When a new maintainer wishes to take over a package, this should be accompanied by the written agreement of the previous maintainer (unless the package has been formally orphaned).
A package listed in ‘Suggests’ or ‘Enhances’ should be used conditionally in examples or tests if it cannot straightforwardly be installed on the major R platforms. (‘Writing R Extensions’ recommends that they are always used conditionally.)
Orphaned CRAN packages should not be strict requirements (in the ‘Depends’, ‘Imports’ or ‘LinkingTo’ fields, including indirectly). They are allowed in ‘Suggests’ if used conditionally, although this is discouraged.
Packages for which
R CMD check gives an ‘ERROR’ when a
new R x.y.0 version is released will be archived (or in
exceptional circumstances updated by the CRAN team) unless the
maintainer has set a firm deadline for an upcoming update (and keeps to
Maintainers will be asked to update packages which show any warnings or significant notes, especially at around the time of a new x.y.0 release. Packages which are not updated are liable to be archived.
As a general rule, neither data nor documentation should exceed 5MB (which covers several books). A CRAN package is not an appropriate way to distribute course notes, and authors will be asked to trim their documentation to a maximum of 5MB.
Where a large amount of data is required (even after compression), consideration should be given to a separate data-only package which can be updated only rarely (since older versions of packages are archived in perpetuity).
Similar considerations apply to other forms of “data”, e.g., .jar files.
Source package tarballs should if possible not exceed 10MB. It is much preferred that third-party source software should be included within the package (as e.g. a vendor.tar.xz file) than be downloaded at installation: if this requires a larger tarball a modestly increased limit can be requested at submission.
If running a package uses multiple threads/cores it must never use more than two simultaneously: the check farm is a shared resource and will typically be running many checks simultaneously.
Examples should run for no more than a few seconds each: they are intended to exemplify to the would-be user how to use the functions in the package.
On Windows and macOS static libraries must be used. A separate document, External Libraries for CRAN packages, covers what external libraries are or could be made available.
std::terminate, Fortran calls to
STOPand so on must be avoided. Nor may R code call
TMPDIR: and such usage should be cleaned up). Installing into the system’s R installation (e.g., scripts to its bin directory) is not allowed.
Limited exceptions may be allowed in interactive sessions if the package obtains confirmation from the user.
For R version 4.0 or later (hence a version dependency is required or
only conditional use is possible), packages may store user-specific
data, configuration and cache files in their respective user directories
tools::R_user_dir(), provided that by default sizes
are kept as small as possible and the contents are actively managed
(including removing outdated material).
.Call()etc calls to base packages. Also,
:::should not be used to access undocumented/internal objects in base packages (nor should other means of access be employed). Such usages can cause packages to break at any time, even in patched versions of R.
Policies for when a (Windows or macOS) binary package will be distributed:
R CMD checkwithout error for all the available sub-architectures, or at CRAN’s discretion, for the most important sub-architecture(s).
Binary packages are not accepted from maintainers: CRAN will only host binary packages prepared by those responsible for the binary areas. Their packages are made automatically by batch jobs and can take a day or two to appear on the CRAN master site (maybe longer to reach CRAN mirrors).
Binary packages are built for the current version of R: they may also be built for the last version in the previous series (e.g. R 3.1.3 when R 3.2.x is current) or for R-devel.
Questions about binary packages should be addressed to those responsible for building them: Simon Urbanek (macOS) and Uwe Ligges (Windows); email addresses ‘First.Lastname@R-project.org’.
When submitting a package to CRAN you should use the submission form at https://CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html (and not send an email). You will be sent a confirmation email which needs to be accepted.
You can check that the submission was received by looking at https://CRAN.R-project.org/incoming/. Submission difficulties (such as non-receipt of the confirmation email) can be discussed with cran-sysadmin@R-project.org.
In more detail:
R CMD buildand following the PACKAGE_VERSION.tar.gz naming scheme. This should be done with current R-patched or the current release of R.
R CMD check --as-cranhas been run on the tarball to be uploaded before submission. This should be done with the current version of R-devel (or if that is not possible and explained in the submission, current R-patched or the current release of R.) For new submissions in particular, please take care to include an informative
Descriptionfield. See submission_checklist.html for details.
In principle, packages must pass
R CMD check without warnings or
significant notes to be admitted to the main CRAN package
area. If there are warnings or notes you cannot eliminate (for example
because you believe them to be spurious) send an explanatory note as
part of your covering email, or as a comment on the submission form.
For interpretation of the URL checks, see URL_checks.html.
R CMD check: it is especially expected that you will have checked your own packages. Reverse dependencies can conveniently be checked using
tools::check_packages_in_dir(reverse = list()), and changes in check status subsequently be analyzed using
tools::check_packages_in_dir_changes(). A listing of the reverse dependencies of the current version can be found on the CRAN web page for the package, or be obtained via
tools::package_dependencies(reverse = TRUE). If possible, check reverse strong dependencies, reverse suggests and the recursive strong dependencies of these (by
tools::package_dependencies(reverse = TRUE, which = "most", recursive = "strong")).
CRAN-submissions@R-project.org) or explain why it is not possible.
If the package needs special treatment (for example if vignettes can only be run or re-built on the maintainer’s machine or take a very long time), say so on the submission form.
Authors can avoid a lot of the all too frequent rounds of updates by checking carefully for themselves. It should be normal for those without Windows machines of their own to use the winbuilder service to check a package before submission. There is a lot of helpful advice on writing portable packages in “Writing R Extensions”.
Before submitting a package update, consult the CRAN check page at ‘https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_NAME.html’, substituting NAME by the name of your package. In particular, wait for that page to be fully updated after publication of a version (which can take at least 48 hours) before submitting any corrections.
Re-submission is done in the same way as submission, using the ‘Optional comment’ field on the web form (and not a separate email) to explain how the feedback on previous submission(s) has been addressed.
Updates to previously-published packages must have an increased version. Increasing the version number at each submission reduces confusion so is preferred even when a previous submission was not accepted.
For packages which have been archived since February 2018, a snapshot of the CRAN results page at the time of archival will be available under https://cran-archive.r-project.org/web/checks/. (Note that only a few of the links from the snapshot will work: normally those to listed ‘Additional issues’ will.)
A package showing issues for
macos-arm64 or an ‘M1mac’ additional
issue should be checked using the
service prior to re-submission.