How to maintain a {fusen}? Can I use {fusen} with old-way packages ?

After you inflate() the “flat_template.Rmd”, your code appears twice in the package. In the “flat_template.Rmd” itself and in the correct place for it to be a package. Take it as a documentation for the other developers.
Maintaining such a package requires a choice:

Option 1: Modifications are only added to the “flat_template.Rmd” file, which then is inflated to update all packages files
Option 2: Modifications are realized in the package files directly as for any other package, and the “flat_template.Rmd” file must be deprecated using deprecate_flat_file().

Your first inflate() may not directly work as expected as with any R code that you write. In this case, you can continue to implement your functionality using Option 1.

Advice 1: Use Option 1 until you find it too complicated to be used ! I assure you, you will find the moment when you say : ok this is not possible anymore…

Advice 2: Use git as soon as possible, this will avoid losing your work if you made some modifications in the wrong place

Advice 3: Create a Readme.Rmd in the “dev/” directory with a chunk having fusen::draw_package_structure() and knit it. This will help to understand the structure of your package and see what is inflated or not. Have a look at the {fusen} package itself on GitHub to see how it looks like.

Option 1: Continue with the “flat_template.Rmd”

(+) You are encouraged to start with documenting and testing your package before you start coding, which is generally a good practice for prototyping.
(+) This does not require to fully understand the package structure and files to continue building your package, and you continue to develop in a unique file
(-) You need to pay attention to checking and debugging tools that may direct you to the R file directly. This requires to pay attention and always be sure you are modifying code in the flat template file, to be inflated.
(-) This may trouble co-developers who already built packages

=> {fusen} itself is built as is. Each modification is added to the dedicated dev_history file and then inflated => The tree structure in the “dev/Readme.md” file is very useful to understand what is inflated or not, and to see the structure of the package

Option 2: Maintain like a classical package

(+) You can use dedicated checking and debugging tools as is, in particular in RStudio. There are built to direct you as quickly as possible to the source of the problem
(+) This allows collaboration with more advanced developers who are used to debug in the package structure directly
(-) You need to remember that you need to care about your users and maintainers, and that you need to document and test your code as soon as possible, in a different place than the code itself.
(-) This requires to understand the structure and files of a package and how they interact each other, and be able to jump from one file to the other, in the correct folder. This may drives you lazy to continue documenting and testing your modifications

You can use deprecate_flat_file() to protect the original flat template file, so that you never use it again. Inflated files are also unprotected, so that you can modify them directly.

=> This is the way I add new functionalities in packages that started in the old way, and in specific cases where inflating is now too complicated, like for function inflate() and all its unit tests in this very {fusen} package.

What about packages already built the old way ?

The “flat_template.Rmd” template only modifies files related to functions presented inside the template. This does not remove or modify previous functions, tests or vignettes, provided that names are different.

{fusen} itself was started in the classical way before having enough functions to be able to build a package from itself. This does not prevent me at all to use {fusen} to build himself now !
If you want to modify existing functionalities, you will need to continue maintain your already-built package in the classical way
If you want to add new functionalities, correctly documented and tested, you can use {fusen}. This will not delete previous work.
Use the “Option 2” above to continue after the development of your functionality

Let’s try to convince package developers with an example

Install {fusen} : install.packages("fusen")
Open a project for one of your already existing package
- Commit your previous state if you are afraid of {fusen}
- If you are not confident enough to try it on an existing package, then create a new package while following the guide in “How to use fusen”
Run in the Console : fusen::add_flat_template("add")
- A Rmd file appears in “dev/flat_additional.Rmd”. Open it.
Write a new function in the function chunk. For instance:

#' My median
#'
#' @param x Vector of Numeric values
#' @inheritParams stats::median
#'
#' @return
#' Median of vector x
#' @export
#'
#' @examples
my_median <- function(x, na.rm = TRUE) {
  if (!is.numeric(x)) {
    stop("x should be numeric")
  }
  stats::median(x, na.rm = na.rm)
}

Add a corresponding example in the example chunk.
- If you’re looking for an equivalent of load_all() but for all functions inside this flat file before inflating, you can use fusen::load_flat_functions()

my_median(1:12)

Add a corresponding unit test in the test chunk. For instance:

test_that("my_median works properly and show error if needed", {
  expect_true(my_median(1:12) == 6.5)
  expect_error(my_median("text"))
})

Run the command of the last chunk of the flat file: fusen::inflate(flat_file = "dev/flat_additional.Rmd")
- This will run {attachment} behind the scene and may modify the list of dependencies in the DESCRIPTION file accordingly. Use fusen::inflate(flat_file = "dev/flat_additional.Rmd", document = FALSE) to avoid that.
- This will also run devtools::check(). Use fusen::inflate(flat_file = "dev/flat_additional.Rmd", check = FALSE) to avoid that.
- This will create a new vignette in your package. You may want to avoid this with fusen::inflate(flat_file = "dev/flat_additional.Rmd", vignette_name = NA)

That’s it!
You added a new function in your package, along with example, test and a new vignette:

R/my_median.R
tests/testthat/test-my_median.R
vignettes/get-started.Rmd

Compare a classical way of building packages with the {fusen} way

Classical with {devtools}	With {fusen}
- File > New Project > New directory > Package with devtools + Or `devtools::create()`	- File > New Project > New directory > Package with {fusen} + Or `fusen::create_fusen()`
- Open “DESCRIPTION” file - Write your information - Run function for the desired license in the console + `usethis::use_*_license()`	- Fill your information in the opened flat file - Execute the chunk `description`
- Create and open a file for your functions in “R/” + `usethis::use_r("my_fonction")` - Write the code of your function - Write a reproducible example for your function - Open DESCRIPTION file and fill the list of dependencies required - Create and open a new file for your tests in “tests/testthat/” + `usethis::use_testthat()` + `usethis::use_test("my_fonction")` - Write some unit tests for your function - Create and open a new file for a vignette in “vignettes/” + `usethis::use_vignette("Vignette title")` - Open DESCRIPTION file and fill the list of “Suggests” dependencies required	- Write code, examples and test in the unique opened flat file
- Generate documentation + Either `attachment::att_amend_desc()` + Or `roxygen2::roxygenise()` - Check the package + `devtools::check()` => `0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 notes`	- Inflate your flat file + Execute `fusen::inflate()` in the last “development” chunk
=> For one function, you need to switch regularly between 4 files	=> For one function, you need only one file

Maintain packages with {fusen}

Daily use of {fusen}